News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor by unicornporn on Thursday February 20, 2014 @11:24AM (#7271624)
Barely usable, yes I agree. So use Startpage.com. They also say they don't spy on you. It works just as good as Google, because it uses Google (see it as a proxy).

DDG is especially terrible if you are used localized versions of Google. I was used to "Swedish Google", and using a localized (Swedish) DDG was totally unusable. And so I found Startpage. Works better than the real deal for me. There are a few differences though. A search operator like site: is named host: as an example.

Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor by MisterWebz on Thursday February 20, 2014 @11:50AM (#7271825)
How come Startpage always shows me local results?
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor by cpeterso on Thursday February 20, 2014 @12:27PM (#7272142)
They could use GeoIP targeting without tracking users with cookies.
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor by rjzzleep on Thursday February 20, 2014 @01:07PM (#7272475)
why don't inurl: site: etc. work properly in startpage.com anyway?
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor by greglindahl on Thursday February 20, 2014 @02:50PM (#7273117)
Scrapers use inurl: and site: a lot; humans, not so much.
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor by dredmorbius on Friday February 21, 2014 @09:00AM (#7276975)
!sp == StartPage.

That's usually my first fallback before going !g