Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by chris_mahan on Thursday February 20, 2014 @12:09PM
(#7271993)
elicit.
(Why correct him? Because I care.)
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by TallGuyShort on Thursday February 20, 2014 @12:23PM
(#7272112)
Oh my, that is quite a difference in meaning. Thank you!
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by dredmorbius on Friday February 21, 2014 @08:55AM
(#7276953)
Kinky is feathers. Illicit is using the whole duck ;-)
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by pepijndevos on Thursday February 20, 2014 @02:41PM
(#7273047)
I know how it feels. I wrote an anti-abuse system that labeled stuff as elicit until a coworker came by.
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by desouzt on Thursday February 20, 2014 @12:24PM
(#7272126)
Why correct him?
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by ithkuil on Thursday February 20, 2014 @12:37PM
(#7272236)
OP's motivations might be different, but a non native english speaker might find that this kind of short, unoffensive and straight to the point corrections could be very useful indeed.
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by infectoid on Thursday February 20, 2014 @05:50PM
(#7274237)
I'm a native. I like corrections. We learn best through failure. Something I would think the HN community would appreciate.
Re:Inside DuckDuckGo, Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor
by chris_mahan on Thursday February 20, 2014 @06:26PM
(#7274393)
(It does, I got 23 upvotes.)
The "I'm feeling ducky" feature never fails to illicit a smile from me.