News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook Buying WhatsApp for $16B in Cash and Stock Plus ... by kashif on Wednesday February 19, 2014 @10:03PM (#7268544)
Also XMPP is non-performant and verbose - these things matter as far a protocols go.
Re:Facebook Buying WhatsApp for $16B in Cash and Stock Plus ... by fennecfoxen on Wednesday February 19, 2014 @10:44PM (#7268703)
More importantly, XMPP has problems delivering the text-message-like experience. It's more of a live-chat protocol. If you want to receive messages when you're offline, things rapidly become a mess.
Re:Facebook Buying WhatsApp for $16B in Cash and Stock Plus ... by zimpenfish on Thursday February 20, 2014 @04:59AM (#7269948)
They shouldn't, though, because pretty much every XMPP server I've seen has user-offline message storage for later delivery eg [1], [2], and the "best practices" have been documented for years, e.g. [3].

Unless you actually mean "receive messages [to your device] when you're offline" and how the hell would that work?

[1] https://prosody.im/doc/modules/mod_offline [2] http://www.process-one.net/docs/ejabberd/guide_en.html#htoc4... [3] http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0160.html

Re:Facebook Buying WhatsApp for $16B in Cash and Stock Plus ... by ge0rg on Thursday February 20, 2014 @07:34AM (#7270416)
fortunately there is improvement in sight: XEP-313 Message Archive Management [0] allows a client to fetch the backlog from its server, at the (privacy) cost of having all your messages stored on the server.

[0] http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0313.html