Re:The Engineer Crunch
by mountaineer on Tuesday February 18, 2014 @02:52PM
(#7260611)
I could upvote this all day. I was rejected by a company that posts about their need for developers constantly, and it irritates me to no end. I provided a big batch of sample code privately, on Github, demonstrated the apps I've shipped, showed great enthusiasm in their product (I was a happy user long before I attempted to join the company). They see all of this before interviews and then they reject me because of how I named a variable in a 15 minute pair-programming exercise and said I should read Code Complete (I have mostly), promptly ignoring the thousands of lines of code they could inspect. I'm sure there was more to it, but still, left a bad taste in my mouth.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That is pretty insulting, especially given the subjective nature of naming things.
Also code complete is ancient, sure much of it is still relevant, I don't think it is the be all and end all though for the modern programmer.
Re:The Engineer Crunch
by mattgreenrocks on Wednesday February 19, 2014 @07:56AM
(#7263349)
Many interviewers simply can't get past the power-trip of interviews. This turns the interview into an awkward tightrope of appearing smart/dependable without being intimidating.
I find myself getting nervous on both sides of the table.