News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An expanded comment on Clojure web development by moomin on Friday February 07, 2014 @03:12PM (#7198424)
It's worth pointing out that in the first case what you get is a pure function that you can test without any mocking whatsoever.

Sinatra's lovely, though.

Re:An expanded comment on Clojure web development by auvrw on Saturday February 08, 2014 @08:30PM (#7203779)
heh, i wouldn't know anything about ruby. that was flask, of course.

the promise of clojure to me (aside from liking lisp) is similar to that of node: only having to maintain one codebase for both client and server sides.

also, really should say thanks to the author of the original article. returned here today when i realized that korma doesn't create tables and i'll need .... lobos, apparently, which was not mentioned in any of my searches for such a library. why didn't this submission get more upvotes?