News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by AndyKelley on Saturday January 25, 2014 @06:46PM (#7123066)
What's wrong with gendered things? The programming language Julia is female, and nobody seems to have a problem with that. What's wrong with a tool that has a male gendered name?
Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by Crake on Sunday January 26, 2014 @03:33AM (#7124407)
I'm sure some feminist somewhere is offended by it. I mean, we say that we use programming languages for things. So clearly using Julia is condoning rape of women, or some such nonsense.
Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by donotsurveil on Saturday January 25, 2014 @08:12PM (#7123345)
Julia is a first name which is free of negative association.

Bro is associated with obnoxious, stupid, despicable, disrespectful.

Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by etjossem on Saturday January 25, 2014 @08:16PM (#7123357)
Git is associated with completely ignorant, childish, and lacking in manners. So what? It's the name of a piece of software, and if there's sufficient adoption, it starts to lose its old meaning in a tech context.

Which, for "bro", is fine by me.

Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by pessimizer on Saturday January 25, 2014 @09:17PM (#7123509)
Git isn't gendered.
Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by etjossem on Saturday January 25, 2014 @09:23PM (#7123524)
Right. I'm just pointing out that it's fine to name software something gendered or something associated with obnoxious, disrespectful people. See Julia and Git, respectively, for examples of the above that seem to be working out just fine.

The real problem is that 'bro' is inherently masculine in a male-dominated industry - which has unfortunate implications if we're trying to be inclusive of women. That's it. If people use it enough as a technical term for a piece of software, maybe 'bro' - like 'man' - will stop feeling weird when you type it into the command line.

Until then, it absolutely is offensive and unwelcoming.

Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by TeMPOraL on Sunday January 26, 2014 @07:31AM (#7124890)
Thus proving that this whole discussion is about the new fashion of aggressive gender-neutrality.
Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by wutbrodo on Sunday January 26, 2014 @02:45AM (#7124272)
> Bro is associated with obnoxious, stupid, despicable, disrespectful.

This sounds a hell of a lot more like an issue with you vs an issue with the term. When I think of 'bro', I think of the short form of calling someone brother endearingly. I wasn't even aware of the frat context until a few years ago. Hell, even within the frat context, it's not necessary "obvnoxious, stupid, despicable, disrespectful", it's just a young guy who's part of the party culture that's associated with college, at least in the US.

Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by girvo on Saturday January 25, 2014 @10:39PM (#7123752)
Seriously? That is what you get from "bro"? Somehow I have a feeling the issue lies in you, not the word there :/
Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by mkr-hn on Saturday January 25, 2014 @09:50PM (#7123612)
I never get that impression when my brother calls me "little bro." And all my friends who were/are close enough to treat like brothers. I'd call women who are that close sis if the culture around gender weren't so weird and arbitrary.
Re:Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only by wiredfool on Sunday January 26, 2014 @01:37AM (#7124142)
It's also the last name of Gaston Julia, who has a set named after him.