News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Debunking Princeton. Parent comment

Re:Debunking Princeton by OverlordXenu on Friday January 24, 2014 @06:25AM (#7114398)
This is just kind of ridiculously fallacious. Surely a slightly inaccurate paper is not comparable to malicious code. That's not a fair comparison to make.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Debunking Princeton by hrjet on Friday January 24, 2014 @07:34AM (#7114595)
I wasn't comparing that particular paper with malicious code. Inaccurate papers in other fields (like biology) might have a more significant impact.

If we were to continue the GitHub analogy, it would be great if ArXiv had a public "issue" list.

[ Parent | on HN ]