Re:Lenovo Agrees to Buy IBM Server Business for $2.3 Billion
by tomasien on Thursday January 23, 2014 @03:23PM
(#7110943)
That's ridiculous - you just said "Snapchat is an entertainment product, it could go away tomorrow and the world would be just fine" - IBM's servers could go away tomorrow and the world would ALSO be just fine - unless you LITERALLY mean they disappear without time to replace or back them up, but I don't think that's your point.
If ALL Entertainment products were gone tomorrow, the world would NOT be just fine it would be SHIT. Just like if ALL servers went away, which is what you jumped to.
Snapchat, incidentally, is not an entertainment product anymore than texting is an entertainment product. It's an entertaining communication product.
Re:Lenovo Agrees to Buy IBM Server Business for $2.3 Billion
by rbanffy on Thursday January 23, 2014 @01:05PM
(#7109858)
You can easily replace an IBM server with any other comparable x86 machine. You can't easily replace Snapchat and the user networks it hosts with another similar service.
Re:Lenovo Agrees to Buy IBM Server Business for $2.3 Billion
by tensor on Thursday January 23, 2014 @01:24PM
(#7110009)
My point is that as a class of product, Snapchat could disappear and not be replaced and no critical infrastructure would halt nor any innovation or science be stopped. At worst you would have some grumpy people.
It's silly to compare this to a product class that is crucial to our society and claim that it is better. The relative worth of one server to another is one thing, but the class of server products is infinitely more important than the class social picture sharing products.
IBMs servers may not be as good as the competition, but to compare them to an entertainment product is silly.