News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by PhasmaFelis on Monday January 20, 2014 @09:29PM (#7093041)
None of the controls on the document viewer are sufficient to see anything but the two-page cover letter. After several minutes of head-scratching, I figured out that you have to click on the tiny, illegible thumbnails under the viewer to see the actual FBI file.

Fantastic UI here.

Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by allochthon on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @12:56AM (#7093719)
Sometimes I wonder whether the difficult-to-read PDF-like interfaces are intentionally made hard to use.
Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by spacemanmatt on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @07:07AM (#7094747)
If this were the movie Brazil, I'd have a fresnel lens over my screen to help read that liliputian typeface.
Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by tlow on Monday January 20, 2014 @11:16PM (#7093397)
And here I was thinking of congratulating the author on having filed a FOIA request.
Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by ressmox on Monday January 20, 2014 @10:54PM (#7093334)
Even after reading your comment it took me a minute to figure it out. Probably because I noticed the the first document was 2 pages and saw 2 thumbnails, so immediately assumed it was just the second page.
Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by morisy on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @01:03PM (#7096994)
Thanks for the feedback. Would love to hear about better embedded options. As far as we can tell, they almost all have drawbacks.
Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by gumby on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @09:49PM (#7100390)
> Would love to hear about better embedded options

How about just posting an image of the first page with an href to the raw pdf? I could then simply read the pdf in my browser. The embedding adds nothing.

Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by seivan on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @06:22AM (#7094589)
Funny thing is that they probably have some UI-expert on site.
Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by danso on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @06:50AM (#7094688)
Probably not, but that document viewer is the product of the DocumentCloud project, which was at one point headed by Jeremy Ashkenas, and from which Underscore and Backbone.js are derived: http://www.documentcloud.org/opensource

However, like most viewers, the DC viewer is best in its standard view, not its embedded view: http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/338833-cover-letter.h...

edit: Ttough yes, the thumbnail nav to go between different documents is not great, though that's more an issue of the site implementation...probably this is a landing page for the docs that would presumably be direct-linked to elsewhere

Re:FBI files on Richard Feynman by weland on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @08:14AM (#7095000)
Like most viewers, the DC viewer is best when it's gone and I can use a proper pdf viewer.