Re:The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO
by Matt_Cutts on Monday January 20, 2014 @06:14PM
(#7092319)
halcyondaze, we see a lot of business owners with small blogs getting tricked by spammers. If you're doing really high-quality guest blogging to get exposure or branding, that's great, but the majority of guest blogging offers these days are sliding into scuzzier and spammier areas.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO
by stephp on Monday January 20, 2014 @08:13PM
(#7092764)
This is the part that confuses me, I guess. The business owner gets the email. It sounds spammy. Maybe they fall for it anyway and receive the article to post. But don't they then realize that it's crappy? It's not as if spammers are logging in to their WordPress account and posting on their behalf. Business owners ultimately have full veto and editing power.
So why don't they cut out the spammy stuff like keyword links? Or, if the content is really garbage, say "no thanks"? The only reason I can see is if they're terribly desperate for content, in which case they're knowingly degrading their own platform.
Re:The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO
by prawn on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @12:13AM
(#7093604)
Have you seen what some less tech-savvy small business owners write themselves as content for their site? Not sure that all of them would recognise exceptionally poor material, especially when they're told by their web developer that it's important to get more content up on their site.
Re:The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO
by stephp on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @01:13AM
(#7093757)
I have to disagree, because I don't see what being tech-savvy has to do with it.
There are therapists, landscapers, used car dealers, craftsmen, accountants, etc. All kinds of people are small business owners and have company blogs. Maybe they fumble around their website, but they can tell when the written content of an article on their topic (landscaping, accounting, etc.) is junk.
Re:The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO
by ghshephard on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @05:33AM
(#7094435)
The tricky thing about content farms, is that it's sometimes hard for humans to tell the crap content from the real content. There is an entire industry of people who will, for $50, give you 500 words on pretty much any topic that you want, and make it sound reasonable - even sometimes without completely plagiarizing Wikipedia.
Re:The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO
by prawn on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @07:05PM
(#7099615)
Not even necessarily $50. There are fairly competent writers who can do 250-300 words for around $6.
Re:The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO
by prawn on Tuesday January 21, 2014 @01:44AM
(#7093825)
Can they tell if it's good enough based on what they see on other web sites, that may or may not be using outsourced writers, guest posts, etc?
A tech savvy user is more likely to be familiar with the reasons and risks and ignore poorer quality writing in their evaluation.
Re:The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO
by bhartzer on Monday January 20, 2014 @06:20PM
(#7092346)
Will the business owners with small blogs get hit by Google or will those doing the guest blogging (those getting the link) get hit?
Re:The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO
by jfoster on Monday January 20, 2014 @06:51PM
(#7092448)
Probably neither. Google talks about dodgy practices more than they actually enforce against them. Until they actually state that they are penalizing something, they are probably not penalizing it.