Re:Help: Who's that girl?
by embeddedradical on Thursday July 16, 2009 @12:07PM
(#708222)
that would be incredible! the news as significant facts (where the editorializing was simply the process of selecting what information to share or is news worthy), and editorials are the editorials; clearly separated! I'm all for it.
But determining what is "significant" is editorializing...
Re:Help: Who's that girl?
by biohacker42 on Thursday July 16, 2009 @12:50PM
(#708303)
Would you prefer that the news be a list of facts?
YES!
Great. We'll have that as soon as people agree what the facts are.
And a wonderful thing it is, but they're both a decade out. No-one can go now, nor anytime soon.
Re:Help: Who's that girl?
by stavrianos on Thursday July 16, 2009 @11:42AM
(#708155)
Who'd want to? I mean, there's dust, and rocks, and big round holes in the dust.
How's about we go someplace actually interesting next?
He3 Mining man! Well, hypothetically anyway.
... And enough He3 to make the oil business look like spare change.
Re:Help: Who's that girl?
by potatolicious on Thursday July 16, 2009 @01:55PM
(#708419)
... and no way to bring it back, and no technology on the near-to-medium term horizon either.
And now no-one at all can go to the moon.
If my memory serves me correctly, both India and China have active space programs that are interested in moon exploration.