News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Help: Who's that girl? by delano on Thursday July 16, 2009 @11:24AM (#708120)
Would you prefer that the news be a list of facts?

And now no-one at all can go to the moon.

If my memory serves me correctly, both India and China have active space programs that are interested in moon exploration.

Re:Help: Who's that girl? by embeddedradical on Thursday July 16, 2009 @12:07PM (#708222)
that would be incredible! the news as significant facts (where the editorializing was simply the process of selecting what information to share or is news worthy), and editorials are the editorials; clearly separated! I'm all for it.
Re:Help: Who's that girl? by soldarnal on Thursday July 16, 2009 @12:51PM (#708305)
But determining what is "significant" is editorializing...
Re:Help: Who's that girl? by biohacker42 on Thursday July 16, 2009 @12:50PM (#708303)
Would you prefer that the news be a list of facts?

YES!

Re:Help: Who's that girl? by phugoid on Thursday July 16, 2009 @01:39PM (#708384)
Great. We'll have that as soon as people agree what the facts are.
Re:Help: Who's that girl? by sho on Thursday July 16, 2009 @11:38AM (#708145)
And a wonderful thing it is, but they're both a decade out. No-one can go now, nor anytime soon.
Re:Help: Who's that girl? by stavrianos on Thursday July 16, 2009 @11:42AM (#708155)
Who'd want to? I mean, there's dust, and rocks, and big round holes in the dust.

How's about we go someplace actually interesting next?

Re:Help: Who's that girl? by DannoHung on Thursday July 16, 2009 @11:48AM (#708174)
He3 Mining man! Well, hypothetically anyway.
Re:Help: Who's that girl? by gaius on Thursday July 16, 2009 @11:49AM (#708176)
... And enough He3 to make the oil business look like spare change.
Re:Help: Who's that girl? by potatolicious on Thursday July 16, 2009 @01:55PM (#708419)
... and no way to bring it back, and no technology on the near-to-medium term horizon either.