Re:Supreme Court to Hear Aereo Case
by Dylan16807 on Sunday January 12, 2014 @01:20AM
(#7045358)
In that scenario, the very premise is wrong. You can copyright integers under certain creative circumstances. It's not the use of logic that's broken.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Aereo Case
by jamesbritt on Sunday January 12, 2014 @04:38PM
(#7047555)
Do you have an example of an integer copyrighted as an integer?
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Aereo Case
by Dylan16807 on Sunday January 12, 2014 @06:20PM
(#7047928)
Do you accept base 36?
How about hex http://daniel.haxx.se/hexpoetry/ http://daniel.haxx.se/hexpoetry/goodies.html
What matters is a certain level of creativity and art. 'as an integer' is no more meaningful than 'as postscript' or 'in times new roman'. It's about the underlying work.
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Aereo Case
by jamesbritt on Sunday January 12, 2014 @08:05PM
(#7048247)
Intersting, though I think the copyright is with the readable poem, not the integer that can be derived by intepreting the poem as hex.
Has this ever been tested in court?