News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by davidw on Monday July 13, 2009 @01:40AM (#701160)
> I swear, "not Hacker News" seems to be the overriding meme here on HN, and it's getting old.

If people would post less of this sort of thing, then you wouldn't see it. Are you really interested in hacker / startup articles or do you just want to see "interesting" things? There are good subreddits for the latter.

See: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=700644

Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by branden on Monday July 13, 2009 @01:55AM (#701172)
http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

"On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups."

Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by davidw on Monday July 13, 2009 @03:30AM (#701286)
Taken at face value, this means that if you get enough people to vote for something, then it's ok, no matter how "off topic" it is.

Since there is no check for "being a hacker" to join this site, presumably I could find a bunch of people interested in, say, the Tour de France, get them to join, and start voting up bike racing articles. Or for that matter, perhaps there are enough people already here interested in bike racing to vote up those articles.

Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by branden on Monday July 13, 2009 @04:33AM (#701332)
Hence the flag button and editors.
Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by davidw on Monday July 13, 2009 @04:58AM (#701362)
So, effectively, there is some sort of "what should be here" standard. It is not just "anything goes" as per the guideline.

This kind of article completely fails the "of more interest to hackers than other people" test, which I think is more relevant.

Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by branden on Monday July 13, 2009 @05:31AM (#701382)
I agree that this article straddles the line, but like you point out, it's a big fuzzy line. I think it's best to just flag and move on.
Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by sho on Monday July 13, 2009 @10:30AM (#701741)
"This kind of article completely fails the "of more interest to hackers than other people" test"

Au contraire, it's front page news at HN, and I don't see it enjoying such popularity at any other aggregator service. That does suggest it is, in fact, of more interest to hackers - or at least the HN variety - than other people.

Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by davidw on Monday July 13, 2009 @11:09AM (#701834)
Just getting something on the front page does not signify that it's hacker news. This article got there, for instance, and was subsequently killed:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=693525

Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by sho on Monday July 13, 2009 @01:44PM (#702134)
From the welcome message:

"Stories on HN don't have to be about hacking, because good hackers aren't only interested in hacking, but they do have to be deeply interesting.

What does "deeply interesting" mean? It means stuff that teaches you about the world. A story about a robbery, for example, would probably not be deeply interesting. But if this robbery was a sign of some bigger, underlying trend, then perhaps it could be."

http://ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

I thought that this submission fell into that category. If you don't agree, well, OK.

(edited to remove personal reference)