News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by cdr on Sunday July 12, 2009 @09:57PM (#700895)
What anybody thinks about it in a post is irrelevant.

Upvote it (or not) if you think it belongs, flag it if you think it doesn't.

Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by kragen on Sunday July 12, 2009 @10:49PM (#700973)
Maybe we should have a separate category for comments about the categorization of an article.

    1. Δ Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship (chronicle.com)
         35 points by kylec 2 hours ago | 11 comments | 28 relevance flames
Re:Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship by DanielBMarkham on Monday July 13, 2009 @06:22AM (#701419)
I think if you gave folks some public way of indicating their complain, instead of an anonymous/invisible flag, it might help. Sometimes people are just driven to do something publicly. After all, flagging might be the way HN works, but it's not necessarily the way people work.