Dropping books on villages when the security situation hasn't been established is akin to dropping landmines - anyone who picks one up and takes it home risks being killed.
There is a very good reason the Afghan campaign was about providing security in an area first then building schools, providing power, healthcare etc.
The problem is that Helmand province (especially) is so close the Pakistani border, and thus limitless reinforcements, providing the security there to do anything else is nigh on impossible.
Provide the security so that people won't be killed for being educated, and education is best. Educating without security just leads to dead kids.
It was once very, very difficult to drop a bomb on a childs head from afar - you used to have to do a lot more. Now its 'easy', relatively speaking. Imagine if that same scale of efficacy were applied, instead, to educating - to healing - to helping instead of killing.
What would the "B1 Bomber" of education systems look like? Lets develop it, and deliver.
I've yet to meet an American who thinks the Trillion dollar military-industrial debt that they owe has been worth it.
At all.
Your statement is simply a complaint that really has no relevance. Are you in favor of giving more in foreign aid, to help build schools, etc?
Of course, if not for the US, some other bully would be there, I perfectly understand that. Thus, no need of answering anything along those lines.
cf Boko Haram - the Nigerian group whose name is literally "Western education is sinful".
Drop books not bombs!