News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenSSL.org hacked? by babuskov on Saturday December 28, 2013 @09:59PM (#6978055)
You can always run browser in a vitrual machine. Or open it with a text browser like Lynx or Links. Or use wget to download the file and read in text editor.
Re:OpenSSL.org hacked? by jrockway on Saturday December 28, 2013 @10:08PM (#6978083)
But what if the page uses HTML5 audio to "jump the gap" and reprogram all nearby electronic devices to attack you on 1/1/2014!?
Re:OpenSSL.org hacked? by drdaeman on Saturday December 28, 2013 @10:25PM (#6978145)
Obviously, VM should have no access to audio outputs, display driver should be rewritten to scramble output to be only viewable using a Lenslok-like device and the whole setup should run on a isolated computer staying in a clean room with a dead-man switch installed that - in case of unforeseen consequences - would quickly power a whole apartment down and call for emergency.
Re:OpenSSL.org hacked? by brianpgordon on Saturday December 28, 2013 @10:37PM (#6978197)
I think you're neglecting to consider the possibility of seismic communication by doing a lot of client-side computation to make the CPU fan kick on and off.
Re:OpenSSL.org hacked? by yk on Saturday December 28, 2013 @10:54PM (#6978270)
Dust of your trusty C64, then you have plenty of time to get yourself some coffee and pull the plug, before the audio starts to play.
Re:OpenSSL.org hacked? by antocv on Sunday December 29, 2013 @05:29AM (#6979114)
Im surprised so many have taken this comment seriously.

not positively surprisrd, more like dissapoined.

Re:OpenSSL.org hacked? by doomrobo on Sunday December 29, 2013 @12:13AM (#6978505)
That's professional paranoia right there. Someone give this man a job and a hard hat.
Re:OpenSSL.org hacked? by EFruit on Sunday December 29, 2013 @01:21PM (#6980552)
A tin-foil hat would probably be better off for his situation.

It prevents mind reading.