Sherlock Holmes Is in the Public Domain, American Judge Rules

Re:Sherlock Holmes Is in the Public Domain, American Judge R... by dragonwriter on Friday December 27, 2013 @05:33PM (#6972910)

> Is there a sensible way to extend copyright on "active" IP that is still being used in new content, while allowing copyright to expire on "dormant" IP that has been left untouched for years?

Periodic -- say, every 7 years -- renewals with exponentially increasing costs to renew.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sherlock Holmes Is in the Public Domain, American Judge R... by AmirS2 on Friday December 27, 2013 @05:56PM (#6972998)

Why bother with exponentially increasing costs? Even a token fee would ensure that copyright expires on abandoned/orphaned works.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sherlock Holmes Is in the Public Domain, American Judge R... by dragonwriter on Friday December 27, 2013 @06:09PM (#6973046)

> Why bother with exponentially increasing costs? Even a token fee would ensure that copyright expires on abandoned/orphaned works.

A token fee would do that for abandoned works, but it wouldn't do it for works which weren't being actively used but which the owner also didn't want others to use -- an escalating fee would be better than a token fee to discourage such buried works.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sherlock Holmes Is in the Public Domain, American Judge R... by rmc on Friday December 27, 2013 @06:05PM (#6973029)

You need increasing fees to prevent big business from automatically renewing all the time. Make them think if they want to renew it all. Otherwise they'll decide the just renew it all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sherlock Holmes Is in the Public Domain, American Judge R... by danielweber on Saturday December 28, 2013 @10:09AM (#6975131)

The problem is deciding what unit to which you need to apply the renewal costs. A photographer may make hundreds of very creative works a year, while an author may make only one.

[ Parent | on HN ]