Reflected hidden faces in photographs revealed in pupil

Re:Reflected hidden faces in photographs revealed in pupil by jamesaguilar on Friday December 27, 2013 @11:17AM (#6971183)

Facebook will store 2000x1???, and the technique proposed here requires 6000x6???. That's a factor of about 20, not 100.

Personally, I will enjoy seeing high res pictures of other people on my 4k monitor when I get one.

Again, not saying I'm 100% that you're wrong, but you're making a bold and unprecedented prediction.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reflected hidden faces in photographs revealed in pupil by ctdonath on Friday December 27, 2013 @11:54AM (#6971383)

Wasn't all that long ago that 320x200 images were considered astoundingly good and sufficient. The "zoom image" scene in Blade Runner was wishful thinking; now we're discussing its imminent reality.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reflected hidden faces in photographs revealed in pupil by rayiner on Friday December 27, 2013 @04:53PM (#6972800)

It also wasn't long ago that we thought we would have flying cars and supersonic airliners. Physics is a cruel master.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reflected hidden faces in photographs revealed in pupil by acchow on Saturday December 28, 2013 @03:34AM (#6974435)

I thought this was a discussion about Facebook serving higher resolution digital photos - why is physics relevant here?

[ Parent | on HN ]