News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oracle to Amazon: It’s on by rgbrenner on Thursday December 26, 2013 @02:22PM (#6967564)
Comparable in size? You're obviously including Amazon's retail side, since AWS is only $3B of amazon's revenue [0] (vs 37B in revenue for Oracle).

Saying they are comparable is saying that when Oracle sells a DB license and Amazon sells a toaster, these are only different in the amount of money the generate. They both have equal experience with software, even though Amazon's experience involves putting an item in a box and putting a label on it.

0. http://www.informationweek.com/cloud/infrastructure-as-a-ser...?

Re:Oracle to Amazon: It’s on by coldtea on Thursday December 26, 2013 @03:23PM (#6967864)
>Comparable in size? You're obviously including Amazon's retail side, since AWS is only $3B of amazon's revenue [0] (vs 37B in revenue for Oracle).

And you're obviously including something in calculating Oracle's size, since Oracle's cloud business is $0 IIRC -- which is much smaller compared to AWS's $3B.

Re:Oracle to Amazon: It’s on by rgbrenner on Thursday December 26, 2013 @03:57PM (#6968007)
$0? Ya know, oracle is a public company.. So it's easy to check and see you're clearly wrong.

Try $1 billion annually in saas revenue

https://m.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/1961632

Re:Oracle to Amazon: It’s on by coldtea on Thursday December 26, 2013 @04:17PM (#6968093)
Still much less than AWS, and far short of the $37 billion mentioned.
Re:Oracle to Amazon: It’s on by rgbrenner on Thursday December 26, 2013 @05:21PM (#6968396)
difference is that the remainder of Amazon sales are retail sales. the remainder of Oracle's sales are software (and some hardware).
Re:Oracle to Amazon: It’s on by aquadrop on Thursday December 26, 2013 @03:55PM (#6968001)
As another commenter already mentioned, what's there to include on Oracle's side for cloud offering. I obviously talk about two large corporations, both with more than 100k employees and tens of billions revenue. Pretty comparable I think.