News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:High Quality PHP by ThomPete on Tuesday December 24, 2013 @11:54AM (#6960090)
And yet FaceBook used HipHop when that became to big a of a problem.

I have worked with people who make same claims as you resulting in us spending endless hours doing preparing for a scale that never happened.

Guess what our client felt about that invoice?

It's a pseudo problem, a theoretical problem, something that can be solved even though it might not be as elegant as the purists would like it to be. But it can be solved if it has to. Most often it doesn't.

Re:High Quality PHP by eropple on Tuesday December 24, 2013 @12:23PM (#6960197)
Yeah I'm not talking about hundreds of thousands of requests, I'm talking about three developers and fifty code files. Which I thought I made eminently clear by talking about dev scaling in my posts rather than load scaling.

That isn't a "pseudo problem".

Re:High Quality PHP by ThomPete on Tuesday December 24, 2013 @01:10PM (#6960409)
Of course it is otherwise PHP wouldn't have been so popular as it is even for more complex solutions.
Re:High Quality PHP by eropple on Tuesday December 24, 2013 @02:08PM (#6960666)
That doesn't follow. Loads of software is written with inferior and suboptimal tools for all manner of reasons. Unix was first written in PDP assembler. That doesn't mean it was a good idea, it means it was done.

Popularity is a bad, bad metric of a tool's quality.

Re:High Quality PHP by ThomPete on Tuesday December 24, 2013 @02:48PM (#6960834)
It means it was a good enough idea and apparently a strong enough tool.

Yours or mine definition of quality is of no importance to this discussion.