Though his point is valid - hydrogen will burn extremely quickly, we used to do these as demonstrations in school. Where a pool of gasoline will burn over a period of time, a tank full of hydrogen will burn almost instantaneously to disastrous effect - forget about rescue, the only sort of "rescue" will be body retrieval of whatever is left.
Which was done in (yeah, I know) an episode of CSI:Miami: http://csimiami.wetpaint.com/page/207:Grand+Prix
Though, of course, hydrogen is far more exciting.
"There is actually more hydrogen in a liter of gasoline (116 grams) than there is in a liter of pure liquid hydrogen (71 grams)!"
But the coolest of all is that hydrogen flames are invisible! Hydrogen flames are so energetic that they emit UV radiation! I remember when I was in grade school and tried electrolysis at home. I managed to collect some hydrogen in a test tube, and I ignited it with a match. I heard a loud bang, but no flame. Sound, but no light. That was fascinating.
Liquid hydrogen leaks can be ignited by the static spark set off by the leak itself?
Hydrogen flames are not visible (see slide 16: hydrogen refinery would look same when on fire as when not.
Compressed H2 gas or Liq H2 have only about 15% or 30% of the energy-per-gallon as gasoline.
And on and on... Sure casts doubt on feasibility of H2 as a medium for energy storage.