News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phon... by glesica on Saturday December 07, 2013 @06:20PM (#6868157)
I, and quite a few people I know (admittedly perhaps not average consumers) refuse to sign contracts partly because the phones are so expensive to replace, and breaking the phone doesn't get you out of the contract. That means you need insurance, which adds to the cost. I would rather fully own my device, have the flexibility to switch carriers, and be able to downgrade my plan if my phone breaks or my needs change.
Re:Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phon... by wvenable on Sunday December 08, 2013 @12:23AM (#6869049)
The biggest problem with that is most carriers don't give you a discount if you own your own phone. So you can either pay $50 a month and get your handset for $200 or pay $50 and get your handset for $600. Which one makes more financial sense?
Re:Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phon... by glesica on Sunday December 08, 2013 @01:53PM (#6870778)
Many carriers are starting to give discounts. T-Mobile does already. Also, I can use an MVNO for quite a bit cheaper than a subscription plan, but I need a phone to do that. Most of the MVNOs will sell you a phone, but it will be a either a full-price model, or a terrible piece of crap.