Re:The ups and downs of the HTTP header
by teddyh on Friday December 06, 2013 @08:32AM
(#6860935)
> Thanks for the clarification about the request line, I'll edit the article to point that out!
(Apparently you weren’t thankful enough to upvote. EDIT: never mind, I must have been mistaken.)
A more accurate description of ISO-8859-1 would be “a crappy 8-bit character set mostly only still relevant for Windows which uses its own embraced and extended version, CP1252.”
Re:The ups and downs of the HTTP header
by teddyh on Friday December 06, 2013 @08:46AM
(#6860977)
I saw your comment and still saw only 1 point on my post; I guess I must have received a downvote too during that time. Oh well, sorry for being huffy.
(Apparently you weren’t thankful enough to upvote. EDIT: never mind, I must have been mistaken.)
A more accurate description of ISO-8859-1 would be “a crappy 8-bit character set mostly only still relevant for Windows which uses its own embraced and extended version, CP1252.”