News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:First Victim of Amazon Drones: The Credibility of CBS and... by danellis on Monday December 02, 2013 @02:02PM (#6835665)
What worries me is that whatever regulations the FAA come up with will suit Amazon just fine, but will put drones out of reach of hobbyists.
Re:First Victim of Amazon Drones: The Credibility of CBS and... by swalsh on Monday December 02, 2013 @02:18PM (#6835802)
I would be surprised. Amazon has a history of developing tech for its own purposes, and then selling the tech. Their SOA architecture is now the backbone for one of the largest cloud services platform on the internet.

They might be the go to supplier for commercial drones in the not to distant future, so when they work with the FAA to get them approved (which i'm sure they're doing), i'd bet they are keeping alternative applications very closely in mind.

Re:First Victim of Amazon Drones: The Credibility of CBS and... by louniks on Monday December 02, 2013 @02:42PM (#6835984)
Remember the "at Amazon, everything is a platform" Google+ post?

Drones as a Service.

Re:First Victim of Amazon Drones: The Credibility of CBS and... by Turing_Machine on Monday December 02, 2013 @11:06PM (#6838408)
Oh, yeah. I could easily see them renting time on unused drones.
Re:First Victim of Amazon Drones: The Credibility of CBS and... by superuser2 on Monday December 02, 2013 @03:39PM (#6836347)
Rules for fully autonomous commercial flight might not (and should not) changed the rules for hobbyist, noncommercial flight.

Manually but remotely piloted aircraft (RC planes) are still a huge hobby and the FAA does not currently care how automated the flight is, only that it is noncommercial and that you can see the aircraft from the controls. It's doubtful that the FAA would amend these rules rather than create a separate category for unattended commercial flight.