News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by untog on Friday November 29, 2013 @04:56PM (#6821177)
Yep, like everything, it's a trade off. In return you get a very robust platform and free fonts.
Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by pandringa on Friday November 29, 2013 @05:18PM (#6821253)
In return for what? Google's not profiting off of Google Fonts, because I'm sure that whatever data they get from it could be collected by their other services.
Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by ars_technician on Friday November 29, 2013 @07:17PM (#6821632)
Logged visits to sites they would otherwise not get. Font request+referrer is useful information.
Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by Silhouette on Saturday November 30, 2013 @03:33AM (#6822653)
If you're concerned about your own privacy in this respect, you can install a plug-in for most browsers that will prevent a real Referer being sent with your requests. Google will still serve you the web font, they just won't know which page you were viewing at the time.

(I'm not making any comment on Google's general strategy or how many people would actually understand that they might wish to protect their privacy in this way, just pointing out that it can be done.)

Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by gress on Friday November 29, 2013 @10:02PM (#6822082)
A trade off implies people understand what Google is doing, which they don't because it's secret.
Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by J_Darnley on Friday November 29, 2013 @06:07PM (#6821426)
My computer or more accurately the operating system came with dozens of fonts, maybe hundreds. Why can't you use one of those?
Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by xnxn on Friday November 29, 2013 @06:36PM (#6821520)
Imagine how ridiculous the web would look today if content creators had to restrict the images they used to some common subset of those preinstalled on clients' operating systems.

Would you condemn web typography to the use of "web safe fonts" forever?

Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by J_Darnley on Friday November 29, 2013 @07:02PM (#6821585)
Yes. I do indeed condemn creators to use a font which renders correctly and I also condemn them to use a size which is legible.
Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by jonknee on Friday November 29, 2013 @06:31PM (#6821501)
Because most of them suck?
Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by SquareWheel on Friday November 29, 2013 @10:12PM (#6822108)
And more than that, each operating system has a different set of fonts.
Re:Google Fonts: more than a trillion served by PavlovsCat on Saturday November 30, 2013 @01:21AM (#6822476)
Isn't it the job of the user agent to have options to override the choices of a website? Otherwise, the subset of "fonts everybody is sure to have" is just too small.

Why not let everybody have websites look how they want them to look? I'm kinda sad this vision gets so little attention, that instead we all try to push our vision on our visitors. Even if the web turns app platform.. just like we have configurable desktop managers, browser could still let everybody customize how websites look - if only websites could stop with the "story telling" and "experiences", and concentrated on utility and information. We're too addicted too shiny for our own good already.