Given the quality of MSFT's and Apple's firewalls, and the ease of use of MSFT's (I assume Apple's is easy to use, but I have no direct experience), I cannot agree that a default DENY firewall policy is a good default configuration. We'd be back in the world where consumers would need something uPnP to manage firewall rules on their router.
I can agree that refusing to route requests to things like port 445/tcp is reasonable.
The router is an AVM FritzBox 7340, the ISP is Snap (New Zealand).
I have no idea if this setting is common or not for IPv6 deployments.
Do you know if you can set that FritzBox up to just act as a DSL->Ethernet bridge and pass through packets to another device that does all the routing? (Sorry if that doesn't make sense. I'm not a professional network nerd, so my terminology might be confused.)
1) Is it easy for a somewhat technical person to change? 2) If you don't mind telling, who's your ISP?