Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises Privacy Concerns

Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises... by Houshalter on Sunday November 24, 2013 @02:39PM (#6790766)

For the most part the victims are anonymous and will never know whether the photo is spreading unless they themselves go to the darker places of the internet.

I see your point, but looking at a photo of someone without their permission is vastly different than raping them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises... by arrrg on Sunday November 24, 2013 @02:48PM (#6790798)

So you think it should only be a crime if the victims know about it? That seems like a weird and unnecessary wrinkle. And I don’t think most victims have to go to “darker places of the internet” to know, given that they were present when the abuse took place and was filmed/photographed.

I would also like to know when I said that raping a child and looking at images of said rape are equivalent crimes.

Also, it’s looking at an image of someone being abused, not just an image of someone.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises... by anonymoushn on Sunday November 24, 2013 @06:06PM (#6791597)

Are all CP images images of abuse? For instance, if two teenagers film themselves having sex, are they both abusing each other?

[ Parent | on HN ]