Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises Privacy Concerns

Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises... by nawitus on Sunday November 24, 2013 @02:30PM (#6790720)

>This is a tricky subject because all of us (excluding the pedophiles) can agree that sexual abuse of children in all forms is a bad thing.

More like the society doesn't allow discussion on these topics. Any opinion which is not perfectly in line with the "official truth" is not acceptable, so there's no point to talk about it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises... by Empathenosis on Sunday November 24, 2013 @02:49PM (#6790803)

^ Pretty much this.

However, as much as it would be great to have the freedom to talk about specific topics. I am moreso concerned on figuring out why Google gives a shit, and what else they are hand-delivering to the feds.

Looks like it's reformat, and use a different search engine time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises... by arrrg on Monday November 25, 2013 @10:14AM (#6794406)

So, uhm, you think there are large numbers of people who think that sexual abuse of children in all forms is a good thing? And that they don’t dare speak?

I sure hope not! Or what was your point again.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises... by nawitus on Monday November 25, 2013 @11:09AM (#6794852)

The point was that no points can be made.

[ Parent | on HN ]