Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises...
by venomsnake on Sunday November 24, 2013 @02:13PM
(#6790642)
Yeah. But a companion question should also be - if they use a potent technology for something i approve of (and we all approve of that uses) can it be (ab)used for something we dislike.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises...
by Karunamon on Sunday November 24, 2013 @02:38PM
(#6790761)
Sure, that's only reasonable. But you're at that point only one step away from a slippery slope argument. (How meta..)
Problem is it's not always a valid question given the context. Automagically scanning images with an algorithm to find known sexual abuse pictures is in a completely different world than scanning images with an algorithm to find copyrighted content, for instance.
Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises...
by greenyoda on Sunday November 24, 2013 @02:59PM
(#6790858)
I think this is a crucial point. To make it more concrete:
In the U.S., having a video of Osama bin Laden congratulating the 9/11 terrorists might be grounds for suspicion.
In China, having a picture of a guy standing in front of a tank in Tiananmen Square is highly frowned upon.