Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises...
by duskwuff on Sunday November 24, 2013 @03:05PM
(#6790880)
See: http://www.missingkids.com/Exploitation/Industry
There is apparently both a database of MD5 hashes of "known bad" image files, as well as a "PhotoDNA" system for fuzzy image matching.
Re:Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises...
by greenyoda on Sunday November 24, 2013 @02:35PM
(#6790754)
If they only did it to remove redundant pictures, they would have no way of knowing that a given image was porn; all they'd know was that it was identical to some other image on their servers.
I wonder whether they do it for redundancy purposes like Dropbox, or whether it's entirely to crack down on child pornography.