News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

Bitcoin vulnerability

What if I use bitaddress.org to create 30000 addresses 200 times. Then I use a script to check if any of these addresses have been used on the network. If they have, then I have their private key.

Then I will make this script open source if its not really a vulnerability.

( 9 comments | 5 points | on HN )
Re:Bitcoin vulnerability by amish on Friday November 22, 2013 @10:12PM (#6785040)
Some basic calculations (based on creating 30000 bitcoin keys per second) tell me it would take you approximately 1.2239x10e60 centuries just to get through 1% of all possible addresses.

Math is fun.

Re:Bitcoin vulnerability by yen223 on Saturday November 23, 2013 @12:19AM (#6785328)
You don't have to go through all possible addresses, you just need to find one that exists, no? Although my gut tells me that's not going to make much of a difference in terms of the size of the search space.
Re:Bitcoin vulnerability by wikwocket on Saturday November 23, 2013 @12:53AM (#6785403)
The point is that there is a staggeringly large amount of possible addresses, and that this space is incredibly sparsely populated by actual wallet addresses. You could generate an enormous amount of addresses looking for bitcoins, and not even come close to likely to finding any.
Re:Bitcoin vulnerability by amish on Saturday November 23, 2013 @01:09AM (#6785434)
To put this into perspective, the universe is only approximately:

13.798±0.037×10e9 years old

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe

Re:Bitcoin vulnerability by mschuster91 on Friday November 22, 2013 @10:05PM (#6785028)
This is futile, the collision chance is unlikely low - the only thing that IS worthwile is doing dictionary attacks on brainwallets!
Re:Bitcoin vulnerability by sidko on Friday November 22, 2013 @10:57PM (#6785139)
You should try it, and update us with how many Bitcoins you were able to get this way :)
Re:Bitcoin vulnerability by amish on Friday November 22, 2013 @10:18PM (#6785045)
I'm sorry, I misspoke. Not centuries. 1.2239x10e60 millennia.
Re:Bitcoin vulnerability by wiml on Friday November 22, 2013 @10:59PM (#6785146)
With a factor of 10^60 in there, the difference between a century and a millennium is down in noise anyway. :)
Re:Bitcoin vulnerability by phaed on Saturday November 23, 2013 @03:49AM (#6785722)
I believe you accidentally some math. It's like looking for a needle in a haystack by checking every atom in the known universe.