News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:High Frequency Dating by rfnslyr on Thursday November 21, 2013 @09:48PM (#6778943)
Thanks for the picnic idea. It's not fair on my part to assume entirely that she would pay on her own, but I would not take her out to an expensive restaurant on that assumption alone. She was capable of paying and threw a fit, I left.

However you seem to act on your own assumptions, so save your judgement for when it matters.

Re:High Frequency Dating by george888 on Friday November 22, 2013 @01:00AM (#6779479)
Dude, you write that one of your desirable qualities is you're "well off". Yet you won't pay. Lol
Re:High Frequency Dating by rfnslyr on Friday November 22, 2013 @08:38AM (#6780591)
She's well off as well, yet she won't pay? Lol
Re:High Frequency Dating by ebrenes on Friday November 22, 2013 @04:10PM (#6783767)
I think the previous poster's point is that being well-off is really not much of a net benefit to a partner if said resources are of no consequence to the relationship or the partner. If you're both at a good economic situation yet going 50/50 the fact that you are also well off doesn't mean much to her and might even register negatively due to social conventions and expectations.

You mention several qualities that are generally perceived in a positive light, but one of these is also a willingness to to share resources, especially in a male/female relationship, as far as I understand it.

Re:High Frequency Dating by rfnslyr on Saturday November 23, 2013 @02:07AM (#6785529)
Not on the first date with a complete stranger that I have no ties to beyond a phone number.