Re:Vi Hart: cramming G+ into YouTube has made comments even ...
by skore on Thursday November 14, 2013 @10:17AM
(#6732749)
There are a good number of channels who have hundreds of thousands of subscribers, combined with the hunger for new content... I think you don't even need to do much incentivizing.
Re:Vi Hart: cramming G+ into YouTube has made comments even ...
by stcredzero on Thursday November 14, 2013 @10:47AM
(#6732922)
Depends on your goals. Duplicating YouTube? How do you make old, obscure stuff available? bakabt does it by incentivizing users to "adopt" old content in exchange for karma.
Re:Vi Hart: cramming G+ into YouTube has made comments even ...
by skore on Thursday November 14, 2013 @10:56AM
(#6732985)
I would say duplication of youtube is neither a feasible nor a desirable goal.
Re:Vi Hart: cramming G+ into YouTube has made comments even ...
by stcredzero on Thursday November 14, 2013 @11:07AM
(#6733068)
So, basically, you're thinking that the Internet as a whole can preserve old, obscure stuff. 90% of the demand is about what's new, and that's exactly what torrents are good at distributing.
Re:Vi Hart: cramming G+ into YouTube has made comments even ...
by steveklabnik on Thursday November 14, 2013 @10:32AM
(#6732829)
There's an initial bootstrapping period before you get to those hundreds of thousands of subscribers, though.
Re:Vi Hart: cramming G+ into YouTube has made comments even ...
by skore on Thursday November 14, 2013 @10:48AM
(#6732924)
True, but you would have that kind of "trying to establish a viewership" either way - it just also extends it into the technical realm. Obviously the "getting people to watch my stuff" problem is a hard one to solve.
Not absolutely true. (Though a lot can be done with incentivizing the user base to make it mostly true.)