Re:The future of M:N threading
by jmount on Wednesday November 13, 2013 @01:00PM
(#6727013)
I can't find the reference, but I remember a grand old rant that threads only progressed so far because Solaris at the time had an very costly process-fork cost compared to other Unices and Windows.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Process spawning has been (and still is!) quite expensive on Windows, I've always associated the push for threads with that, ie being kludge for crappy kernels :)
What about shared memory?