News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thoughts on a New Dylan Ecosystem by graue on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @12:55PM (#6719417)
As a Clojurist not familiar with Dylan, that sounds awesome, but then it also just sounds like Clojure. What does Dylan add to the mix?

I'm reading their "Why Dylan?" page:

http://opendylan.org/documentation/intro-dylan/why-dylan.htm...

and I don't see anything that makes me want to go run and install it. I'm already used to dynamic, garbage-collected, infix programming languages that can be used in a functional style. Heck, JavaScript is one. Integers and strings are objects, cool, but how does that help me prototype faster or write more maintainable code?

Re:Thoughts on a New Dylan Ecosystem by BruceM on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @03:59PM (#6721022)
You're missing the optional static typing, the multimethods, the Common Lisp-style condition system, the ability to produce native and efficient executables ...
Re:Thoughts on a New Dylan Ecosystem by graue on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @04:50PM (#6721452)
> optional static typing

https://github.com/clojure/core.typed

> multimethods

http://clojure.org/multimethods - also, arguably better for many use cases: http://clojure.org/protocols

> native and efficient executables

Clojure performs much better than popular web development language implementations like Python, Ruby or Node.js. See http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/ People have found it performant on harder problems: http://clojurefun.wordpress.com/2013/03/07/achieving-awesome... And it's possible to produce executables that depend only on the JVM, which is just as easy as fully-native for deployment.

I grant you the one about the Common Lisp condition system. I wasn't familiar, but reading about it (http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CommonLispConditionSystem), it does look intriguing. Apparently something inspired by it is available as a Clojure library, but the last commit was 10 months ago, and I hadn't heard of it till now: https://github.com/scgilardi/slingshot

Re:Thoughts on a New Dylan Ecosystem by TylerE on Tuesday November 12, 2013 @03:47PM (#6720909)
"It's not s-expr based".

For some us, sexps are just not mentally parsed.