News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linux ate my RAM by jheriko on Monday November 11, 2013 @07:50AM (#6711318)
right. so there is a bug in linux. gotcha.
Re:Linux ate my RAM by gmuslera on Monday November 11, 2013 @10:05AM (#6711920)
Leaving your memory with no use at all would be the bug. It is a free resource that could be used to improve system performance at basically no cost (the disk is already read, the memory is still available immediately for any app that request it, etc), so it is a good default to let linux do it.

But could be cases where it could be side effects of it (i.e. running in a VM could make less memory available for the host, and it could be caching disk already) so you could consider to disable it sometimes.

Re:Linux ate my RAM by annnnd on Monday November 11, 2013 @08:08AM (#6711380)
No. Well, not technically... There is a UX bug in Linux. Not the only one at that, but they don't count much in Linux-land.
Re:Linux ate my RAM by hansbogert on Monday November 11, 2013 @09:18AM (#6711661)
Just a difference in semantics -- I mean, c'mon UX in a utility like top? which is probably specified in some Unix convention anyway. Pure BSD Unix do this as well in their own way.
Re:Linux ate my RAM by CmonDev on Monday November 11, 2013 @08:33AM (#6711467)
Free is used, black is white, truth is a lie, lie is a truth.
Re:Linux ate my RAM by jheriko on Monday November 11, 2013 @03:29PM (#6713770)
it confuses users. its a bug. thank you for the -4 points... :)