News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Track Europe's falling, 2,000-pound satellite in real-time by simias on Saturday November 09, 2013 @04:08PM (#6703239)
There's only a 31km difference between the "lowest" and "highest" surface point on earth so I doubt that's what's going on here. More likely is its orbit eccentric and while it seems to go up it continually loses speed due to the atmosphere slowing it down and its average altitude keeps going down continually (although obviously more when it's close to the periapsis, the point of closest approach).
Re:Track Europe's falling, 2,000-pound satellite in real-time by lostlogin on Saturday November 09, 2013 @04:41PM (#6703384)
Could you explain that figure to me please? Everest isn't nearly that high, so are you starting at the bottom of a trench? Surely the meaningful low point is the lowest point (be it the sea or some other low point) that the inbound fiery ball could hit?
Re:Track Europe's falling, 2,000-pound satellite in real-time by shawnz on Saturday November 09, 2013 @06:18PM (#6704007)
The earth is not spherical. The diameter of the earth through the equator is more than the diameter through the poles, because of its angular velocity. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure_of_the_Earth