News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Another Model S fire by rgbrenner on Thursday November 07, 2013 @10:54AM (#6690032)
Yes, it says Tesla talked to the driver. It doesn't say the driver says there was an accident. Why did tesla include the quote from the dispatcher if that wasn't part of what they were basing their conclusion on?

They have a confirmation from the driver, but instead of saying that, they include speculation from the dispatcher? I don't buy that.

[deleted]
Re:Another Model S fire by rgbrenner on Thursday November 07, 2013 @11:37AM (#6690350)
Nice try.. but the Reuters article uses the forum that this HN post links to as the source for the part about Tesla talking to the driver... that forum has a post in it made by Tesla.. And no where in the part where Tesla says they talked to the driver do they say the driver said there was an accident.

In an update to that post, Tesla then linked to the Reuters article as a source for the quote from the dispatcher (and quoted the part from the article with the dispatchers comment) and says it looks like it was an accident.

You can't attribute everything to the driver simply because Tesla exchanged a couple of (unknown, unquoted) words with him/her.