Ruby has entered the Enterprise thanks to the Enterprise gem

Re:Ruby has entered the Enterprise thanks to the Enterprise gem by rleisti on Thursday June 18, 2009 @03:22PM (#663975)

What I'd really like, is a way to express xml in xml, so I can be super-productive all day long recursively writing a single xml document.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ruby has entered the Enterprise thanks to the Enterprise gem by ewiethoff on Thursday June 18, 2009 @08:10PM (#664397)

You want XSLT. ;-)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ruby has entered the Enterprise thanks to the Enterprise gem by prodigal_erik on Friday June 19, 2009 @12:46PM (#665451)

XPath is far too concise. It needs an XML encoding. Something like PMML, where math looks like

  <DefineFunction name="frob" optype="continuous"> 
    <ParameterField name="x" optype="continuous"/> 
    <Apply function="+">
      <FieldRef field="x"/>
      <Constant>42</Constant>
    </Apply>
  </DefineFunction>

I wish I were joking.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ruby has entered the Enterprise thanks to the Enterprise gem by ewiethoff on Sunday June 21, 2009 @09:13PM (#668050)

Content MathML to the rescue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MathML#Content_MathML

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ruby has entered the Enterprise thanks to the Enterprise gem by igorgue on Friday June 19, 2009 @12:00PM (#665362)

that comment was gold

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ruby has entered the Enterprise thanks to the Enterprise gem by j_baker on Friday June 19, 2009 @08:32AM (#664992)

I think you'd also need a way to express that xml xml using xml as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ruby has entered the Enterprise thanks to the Enterprise gem by sp332 on Friday June 26, 2009 @04:02PM (#675996)

XXMLML?

[ Parent | on HN ]