News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What 'Lean In' Misunderstands About Gender Differences by speeder on Thursday October 17, 2013 @01:53PM (#6566983)
Actually the few matriarchal societies that existed, women were more nurturing and risk averse, and this is why they "existed", patriarchal enemies could easily wipe the floor with them.

Also I remember seeing in the opening of a openly feminist franchise, a women describing a certain matriarchal society that exists in modern day (I forgot their name though :( but it is somewhere in backwater asian Russia), and I got curious and went to research and...

Actually, only the commoners of that society are matriarchal, nobles follow a more or less patriarchal system (men inherit form men, and women from women, most political power of the nobles are with the men though, but there is no formal rule against women having it too), and the nobles enforce matriarchy on the commoners (people do not remember anymore why they do it, but research suggests that the reason was to keep commoners tame and keep them from rebelling)

Re:What 'Lean In' Misunderstands About Gender Differences by whiddershins on Thursday October 17, 2013 @02:03PM (#6567047)
Oh, come on. If you are going to say things which back up such a potentially sexist and gender role supporting argument, you need to do better than one anecdote you read once.

Read some real anthropological texts, research Sumerians and Ancient Celts. Read Sex at Dawn, there is a lot more to this discussion about gender roles in historical societies than you are touching on.