Re:Aaron Swartz’s last gift to journalism and online privacy...
by piratebroadcast on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @02:22PM
(#6555266)
My attempt at a translation: I wonder how secure and anonymous it can be, when it seems that everything, maybe even subatomic particles, are monitored in real time. (And people are possibly using simulations to predict the future?)
Re:Aaron Swartz’s last gift to journalism and online privacy...
by Loughla on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @05:48PM
(#6556601)
Your ability to speak 'stoned' is amazing.
Re:Aaron Swartz’s last gift to journalism and online privacy...
by SteveArmstrong on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @02:08PM
(#6555152)
I feel like I'm trying to decode a regex. Could you reword that a little clearer?
Re:Aaron Swartz’s last gift to journalism and online privacy...
by moocowduckquack on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @02:15PM
(#6555224)
Unfortunately I suspect that in terms of information density, it is likely to be the opposite of a regex.
Re:Aaron Swartz’s last gift to journalism and online privacy...
by trauco on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @02:29PM
(#6555315)
There was a recent Security Assessment of the project, see here:
http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~aczeskis/research/pubs/UW-CS...
I believe the developers answered and made changes, but he blog post detailing the response is down at the moment:
Re:Aaron Swartz’s last gift to journalism and online privacy...
by moocowduckquack on Tuesday October 15, 2013 @02:00PM
(#6555090)
Come again?
Whatever, you'll know when it hits you...