Two-laser boron fusion lights the way to radiation-free energy

Re:Two-laser boron fusion lights the way to radiation-free e... by ch4ch4 on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @02:14PM (#6516756)

Lies! It's not radiation-free because light and heat was generated (and thus radiated)!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Two-laser boron fusion lights the way to radiation-free e... by batbomb on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @02:59PM (#6517065)

When it's mentioned in the "potentially harmful" scope, "radiation" is shorthand for ionizing radiation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Two-laser boron fusion lights the way to radiation-free e... by ch4ch4 on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @04:07PM (#6517488)

Yet there's no shorthand for the "potentially beneficial" scope...

I just hate that the general public connotes "radiation" with "harmful".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Two-laser boron fusion lights the way to radiation-free e... by ars on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @05:16PM (#6517908)

> Yet there's no shorthand for the "potentially beneficial" scope...

Yes there is. The main word is "light". And also "warmth" or "radio waves".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Two-laser boron fusion lights the way to radiation-free e... by pygy_ on Tuesday October 08, 2013 @05:34PM (#6517982)

... and X-rays, radiotherapy, scintigraphy...

Still, the fact is that "radiation", for the layman, means nocive radioactivity.

[ Parent | on HN ]