W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards

Re:W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards by jonahx on Thursday October 03, 2013 @03:39PM (#6491409)

This news makes me so sad. Also: The more things progress, the more and more sense RMS makes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards by MarcScott on Thursday October 03, 2013 @03:53PM (#6491542)

I wish I could upvote more than once.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards by rimantas on Thursday October 03, 2013 @07:44PM (#6492900)

Actually RMS makes less and less sense each day (and has nothing to do with this issue at all), and comments of this kind are getting annoying.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards by bigphishy on Thursday October 03, 2013 @11:13PM (#6493529)

Wait.. are you being facetious? Can you explain why you feel this way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards by _j5l3 on Friday October 04, 2013 @01:59AM (#6493949)

What is RMS in this context? Googling got me nowhere.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards by sounds on Friday October 04, 2013 @02:12AM (#6493973)

We're talking about DRM and content protection, so RMS' 1997 short story seems apropos:

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:W3C green-lights adding DRM to the Web's standards by oscargrouch on Friday October 04, 2013 @03:10PM (#6497311)

RMS -> Richard Matthew Stallman

[ Parent | on HN ]