News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Web Designer by lukeschlather on Monday September 30, 2013 @02:30PM (#6471337)
Firefox+NoScript does a pretty good job. Typically, the domains that host the JavaScript to run the ads have no JavaScript I actually want executed.

If there's an exceptional case I open it in a Chromium private browsing window.

Re:Google Web Designer by abalone on Monday September 30, 2013 @02:54PM (#6471489)
NoScript blocks all javascript except for a whitelist you have to construct. That's way too disruptive as a general solution. We need something easy and automatic.
Re:Google Web Designer by subsection1h on Monday September 30, 2013 @06:08PM (#6472722)

    NoScript blocks all javascript except for a whitelist you have to construct.
Blocking JavaScript is just one of NoScript's many features. (NoScript's other features include blocking plugins and other embeddings (e.g., HTML5 video and audio), as well as protecting against XSS, CSRFs, and clickjacking.) I use NoScript, but I don't use it to block JavaScript. NoScript's ability to block HTML5 video and audio is one of my favorite features, and I hope that NoScript will block additional HTML5 annoyances in the future, especially as advertisers and other troublemakers make greater use of HTML5.
Re:Google Web Designer by yk on Monday September 30, 2013 @04:07PM (#6472010)
I am quite happy with Ghostery+NoScript. If you have a general solution, then you would just end up with an arms race. See [0] for details.

[0] http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2010/12/its-made...

Re:Google Web Designer by codereflection on Monday September 30, 2013 @04:16PM (#6472083)
IMHO - Ghostery should not be used, Disconnect should be used instead (https://disconnect.me/). Why? Because Ghostery is selling data to advertisers. https://www.hnsearch.com/search#request/submissions&q=ghoste...
Re:Google Web Designer by fixanoid on Monday September 30, 2013 @04:44PM (#6472248)
Heres a more comprehensive article on the topic: http://purplebox.ghostery.com/?p=1016023438

Ghostery would only send data back to Evidon if GhostRank option is enabled.

Re:Google Web Designer by Semaphor on Monday September 30, 2013 @05:00PM (#6472340)
Plus Disconnect.me is FOSS and (at least when I switched) blocks more than Ghostery.
Re:Google Web Designer by yk on Monday September 30, 2013 @05:31PM (#6472510)
Yes, but IMHO they are still the best trade off. ( But I will have a look at disconnect, thanks for the link.)
Re:Google Web Designer by est on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @12:13AM (#6473993)
> We need something easy and automatic.

Like running ads in a standalone plugin which could be easily disabled. Wait...