News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Web Designer by andybak on Monday September 30, 2013 @01:50PM (#6471052)
It's going to be trickier as just blocking a single plugin is no longer viable.

I think an domain blacklist a la Adblock is probably the best idea but that won't help you with ads that are already present in the DOM on pageload.

Re:Google Web Designer by McGlockenshire on Monday September 30, 2013 @02:08PM (#6471187)
Thankfully, AdBlock and friends can also target DOM elements for hiding or outright elimination.
Re:Google Web Designer by est on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @12:12AM (#6473987)
Why do we even waste time detectin and hiding ads? WHy can't we not wasting bandwidth download it at all?
Re:Google Web Designer by GhotiFish on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @11:17AM (#6476710)
well. You can't tell the server what to send, really.
Re:Google Web Designer by ChikkaChiChi on Monday September 30, 2013 @02:10PM (#6471200)
...which they have gotten overly aggressive on; creating a myriad of issues with normal website functionality.
Re:Google Web Designer by sequoia on Monday September 30, 2013 @02:41PM (#6471413)
Can you give an example? The only issue I've ever had with ABP et al. is when I'm working on a site and forget to turn it off & I think my site is broken (because ad doesn't load). :p
Re:Google Web Designer by ChikkaChiChi on Monday September 30, 2013 @03:03PM (#6471554)
One of our webdevs complained about some issue that was causing issues with our site in particular (regarding generic id names being blocked) and since then I've had several anecdotal instances where disabling adblock on sites seems to clear up nagging issues.

I should have been more clear. My apologies.

Re:Google Web Designer by chid on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @04:26AM (#6474896)
Well it happens if you name your javascript ad*.js or similar, also should be extremely easy to find.
Re:Google Web Designer by aestra on Monday September 30, 2013 @02:40PM (#6471408)
I haven't found a significant example of this, and I've been browsing with Adblock Plus for years. The only place I've seen issues with is some video streaming sites, when it interferes with streaming ads.
Re:Google Web Designer by abalone on Monday September 30, 2013 @03:05PM (#6471559)
Doesn't Adblock Plus alter the structure of the page, which can mess up layout?

Also believe it or not I don't want to block all ads, just animated ones. I want a general solution for All People, not just us nerds, and erasing advertising from the web would destroy a lot of businesses.

I want something browser makers can build in and turn on by default, which is what Safari has essentially done now with Mavericks (Flash and Java are blocked by default.. Flash under the rubric of power conservation).

Re:Google Web Designer by pbhjpbhj on Monday September 30, 2013 @04:13PM (#6472059)
There's a setting in ABP for Firefox that allows you to show "placeholders of blocked elements". I think that's what you're after if you want to use ABP and maintain the layout?
Re:Google Web Designer by GhotiFish on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @11:20AM (#6476737)
AdBlock Plus is running an initiative of acceptable ads.

That is the solution, frankly.

Re:Google Web Designer by ljd on Monday September 30, 2013 @09:25PM (#6473487)
Maybe a crowd sourced blocker would be ideal for identifying divs in a site.

It would be a plugin that allows you to mark a spot on a page that is an ad and the plugin will record the very specific CSS path and hide it permanently for you and others that go to visit that site.

Maybe once you have a significant number of CSS paths you could do something with machine learning to identify the likeliness of a div containing an ad and block it when it crosses a certain degree of confidence.