Re:Sequoia's Michael Moritz on how he picks companies
by ajju on Sunday June 07, 2009 @04:58AM
(#645763)
Yes, Moritz is suggesting that companies (at least some of them) are more willing to take the risk of buying from a stratup, if it offers them a tremendous advantage.., during a recession.
I am wondering if there are entrepreneurs who can corroborate this theory based on their experience.
Re:Sequoia's Michael Moritz on how he picks companies
by jpwagner on Sunday June 07, 2009 @05:35AM
(#645785)
You just used nearly the exact terminology from the original quote. Sorry, I do not think the concept is clear.
Since the advantage over 'the standard' changes depending on what product and what startup we're talking about, this seems to be more of a comment on the likelihood of the buyer to stick with 'the standard'. (additionally, the wording (and paraphrasing) are not making this clearer...some companies...more likely...tremendous advantage...etc)
I'm attempting to make "his theory" concrete in wording so that it's comprehensible. I think you can boil "his theory" down to:
Buyers' preference for 'the standard' is inversely proportional to the current economic state.
What do you think?
I don't think I understand the significance of this statement. You always buy a product that 'offers a tremendous advantage that will help [you] become more efficient or lower [your] costs.'
Is the significance that in a recession a prospective customer is less likely to buy 'the standard'?