Re:Unmanned sub touches deepest part of world's ocean
by kragen on Wednesday June 03, 2009 @07:37PM
(#640676)
I don't see how. Accelerated rusting? Transition to a different crystal structure?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Unmanned sub touches deepest part of world's ocean
by miloshh on Wednesday June 03, 2009 @09:25PM
(#640794)
Maybe by simply stretching the wire by the force of water movement (like pulling a guitar string up really hard).
Re:Unmanned sub touches deepest part of world's ocean
by jonah on Wednesday June 03, 2009 @09:04PM
(#640765)
Crushing?
Re:Unmanned sub touches deepest part of world's ocean
by ars on Wednesday June 03, 2009 @11:07PM
(#640889)
Crushing on an atomic level?
There is no void (air) inside the cable, and the pressure is even all the way around - the only crushing you can do is move the atoms closer to each other. (Compress actually, not crush, and iron is basically incompressible.)
Re:Unmanned sub touches deepest part of world's ocean
by kragen on Thursday June 04, 2009 @07:58AM
(#641243)
"moving the atoms closer to each other" is what I was talking about; under some circumstances, that could manifest as a shift to a different crystalline structure. (If you search for information on high-pressure crystalline phases of materials, you'll find a lot of interesting things.) "Iron is incompressible" is often a useful approximation, but no material is actually incompressible (that would entail, among other things, faster-than-light propagation of shock waves and infinite hardness) and many day-to-day materials are less compressible than iron. Glass, for instance.
Most metal objects do actually have voids in them, but you can manufacture metal objects that don't, and it's not clear that having voids in your cable would cause it to be damaged by pressure.