Re:The Engineer Who converted 12,100 Cups Of Pudding to 1.25...
by tedsanders on Wednesday September 18, 2013 @01:51PM
(#6406746)
To me, hacking a device is quite different than hacking a promotion. When you hack a device, there's usually no victim. However, when you hack a commercial transaction, there typically is a victim because most transactions are zero-sum (or at least the transaction surplus is zero-sum).
Re:The Engineer Who converted 12,100 Cups Of Pudding to 1.25...
by ondiekijunior on Wednesday September 18, 2013 @11:42AM
(#6405913)
I like the hacker mentality of interpretation
Re:The Engineer Who converted 12,100 Cups Of Pudding to 1.25...
by gnoway on Wednesday September 18, 2013 @09:18AM
(#6405043)
A promotion, not a device. It's different.
Anyway the intent was more sarcasm than anything, but I guess I'll take the karma hit.
Re:The Engineer Who converted 12,100 Cups Of Pudding to 1.25...
by kamjam on Wednesday September 18, 2013 @11:00AM
(#6405668)
It made me laugh too, and I got the sarc, but I think it's the last bit which really killed the karma... And we're lauding this accomplishment? Or maybe add a </sarc> next time just to make it clear for everyone :)
Re:The Engineer Who converted 12,100 Cups Of Pudding to 1.25...
by fc2 on Wednesday September 18, 2013 @11:13AM
(#6405750)
If it was indeed sarcasm then it was too subtle for HN. I mean if you had posted that on 4chan then it would be blatant sarcasm, but people on HN take themselves a little to seriously so it's a lot harder to tell.
At least this first part seems close to most definitions of hacking I know.