Sea Change – The Pacific's Perilous Turn

Re:Sea Change – The Pacific's Perilous Turn by callmeed on Friday September 13, 2013 @06:25PM (#6383577)

As a non-atheist (christian), it's nice to have common ground on this view. It's a shame IMO that U.S. christians are so closely linked with anti-environmentalism (and the republican party, but that's for another day) but stewardship of the earth is clearly called for in both the old and new testaments.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sea Change – The Pacific's Perilous Turn by indefatigable on Friday September 13, 2013 @07:47PM (#6383942)

Stewardship means handing it over to fascists?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sea Change – The Pacific's Perilous Turn by anthonyarroyo on Friday September 13, 2013 @07:54PM (#6383978)

exqueeze me?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sea Change – The Pacific's Perilous Turn by indefatigable on Friday September 13, 2013 @07:59PM (#6384001)

When someone says they have the right to dictate not only how much energy I use, but also where that energy comes from, I call it fascism.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sea Change – The Pacific's Perilous Turn by tptacek on Friday September 13, 2013 @10:12PM (#6384359)

I don't think the word "fascism" means what you appear to think it means.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sea Change – The Pacific's Perilous Turn by Steko on Friday September 13, 2013 @09:09PM (#6384203)

Then you should also call it fascism when the pollution from your energy use harms others.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sea Change – The Pacific's Perilous Turn by DanBC on Friday September 13, 2013 @09:12PM (#6384210)

Ignore (and down vote) the trolls.

[ Parent | on HN ]