News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How is Docker.io different from a normal virtual machine? by jmspring on Friday September 13, 2013 @03:43AM (#6379184)
Some of us do, when appropriate.

Docker took a technology known to many that setup/admin/manage machines, added some fluff, made things simpler, and marketed the idea.

In a crowd that might spend more time thinking about nodejs and callbacks vs promises or how easily one can tip a rails app up on heroku, existing systems tools for things like jails/virtualization may either be over looked or not a concern.

For every docker, there are people (of which I may be one) that think , "big deal, it is just x". Meanwhile that thing is getting traction and popularity. It might not last, but it is around and making noise now.

Re:How is Docker.io different from a normal virtual machine? by Swizec on Friday September 13, 2013 @05:04AM (#6379334)
"added some fluff, made things simpler, and marketed the idea"

Well what on earth do you need a pre-assembled computer for? You just take some circuit boards and a soldering iron, then assemble everything over the weekend and you have a perfectly good computer. I don't understand why this Apple I thing is so popular, it's nothing special.

Far as I can tell, every successful piece of tech out there can be reduced to "Added some fluff, simplicity, and marketing to an already existing technology"

Re:How is Docker.io different from a normal virtual machine? by gurraman on Friday September 13, 2013 @07:54AM (#6379841)
They also created an operative system (sure, it builds on existing tech but they added a lot more than just fluff).
Re:How is Docker.io different from a normal virtual machine? by mtkd on Friday September 13, 2013 @03:59AM (#6379222)
It is a simple abstraction of something that many people find very complicated - or choose to not spend time understanding / configuring.

(You could say same about Github, Travis etc.)

Re:How is Docker.io different from a normal virtual machine? by lars512 on Friday September 13, 2013 @05:42AM (#6379428)
There's probably some fair value in making things simpler, not to mention value in marketing. If they can form a large community around it through their marketing, then the tooling will rapidly improve. So, the marketing can be a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy.
Re:How is Docker.io different from a normal virtual machine? by derefr on Friday September 13, 2013 @07:15AM (#6379721)
Honestly, I have no idea if the software I write runs on FreeBSD. I know it runs on Linux, and therefore I know I can package it with Docker.

And I think that's the crux of it--do you think anyone would use Heroku if its container environment were FreeBSD-based? I'm guessing not; nobody develops on FreeBSD, so they'd have to test on a separate FreeBSD VM before deploying.

Re:How is Docker.io different from a normal virtual machine? by justincormack on Friday September 13, 2013 @11:25AM (#6381074)
Lots of people seem to develop on Macs, so Linux is a VM to them. And if it runs on a Mac it probably runs on FreeBSD. Joyent seems to be managing with non-Linux containers too.
Re:How is Docker.io different from a normal virtual machine? by FreeBSD-user on Saturday September 14, 2013 @04:30AM (#6385052)
That's a shame, FreeBSD is actually a pretty impressive OS. You should give it a try, mono-cultures aren't a good thing.